EL
UNIVERSO CASE
Rafael Correa demanded to El Universo newspaper on
March 21 of 2011; the judgment explained that the article affected the
reputation, the dignity and the honor of Rafael Correa. All of that could
change the opinion of the Ecuadorian people about the government of Correa and
he maybe could lose popularity.
In the law sentence, Correa request 80 million dollars
and three years in jail for the editors of El Universo newspaper, Carlos,
Nicolás y César Pérez; of El Universo newspaper and the editor of opinion
section, Emilio Palacio.
The first audience was on July 19 of 2011 in the 15th
court of criminal warranties in Guayaquil city. There El Universo newspaper
offered to public an article which the president could write a rectification
about the ¨No a las mentiras” article, but Correa did not accept this and the
trial was continuing. On July 20, the judge passed the judgment in which
explained that El Universo newspaper had to pay 40 million dollars.
The lawyers of El Universo newspaper appealed the
verdict, but in the second audience the sentence was ratified by the court. The
respondents had to present the demand with the International Commission of
Human Rights, and they requested for precautionary measures. After that, Correa
expressed the possibility to use the forgiveness resource. The International
Commission of Human Rights accepted the request of precautionary measures in
favor of El Universo newspaper. On February 27 of 2012, the president, Rafael
Correa, expressed his forgiveness to the newspaper and its editor.
In addition, this case demonstrated that is evident
the attacks on critical or independent media by the Ecuadorean government that
is restricting the right to freedom of expression. These attacks range from
insults against journalists and the media, to the closing of media sources, or
the imposition of an official publishing.
VIOLATION OF
HUMAN RIGHTS IN "EL UNIVERSO" CASE
The IACHR applied measures of precautionary and
solicited the immediate suspension of the effects of the judgment, is found in the official # 428 record, published on September 18, 2008 that recognizes its
obligation and assigned to the Ministry of Justice and human rights of the
Executive function decreased, guarantee and ensure full compliance with
competition "statements, precautionary measures, provisional measures,
friendly agreements, recommendations and resolutions originating in the
Inter-American system of human rights".
Emilio Palacio, the author of the article "No a
las mentiras”, which led to the demand, Carlos Nicolás Pérez Lapentti, Carlos
Pérez Barriga and César Pérez Barriga. Accordingly, the Inter-American
Commission on human rights requests the Government of your Excellency to
immediately suspend the effects of the judgment of February 15, 2012, in order
to guarantee the right to freedom of expression", says an extract of the
referred to the regime through a statement dated yesterday, according to the
Agency.
There are two key points of the violation of human
rights towards palaces: political persecution and violation of their right to
freedom of expression. There is no more fundamental institution for democracy
that a free and independent press. The freedom of press helps to protect the
rule of law and ensure that everybody is above the rules and procedures that
govern a democratic society. The freedom of press helps ensure transparency to
induce Governments to be honest and accountable to their citizens.
Unfortunately, recent events in the Ecuador suggest a deliberate move away from
these democratic traditions, and this could have serious consequences for
democracy in the Ecuador.
In
our opinion, the President and all of us should denounce the attacks against
the press in Ecuador and in any place in the world, for protect freedom of
expression which is a fundamental right enshrined in the Universal Declaration
of human rights and the American Declaration of the rights and duties of man is
a concern and responsibility of all. Thus, we support the people of the Ecuador
and their right to be heard, and the future of its democracy.
REACTION
OF THE INTERNATIONAL ORAGANIZATIONS
When it was the ratification of the judgment to the
diary the Universe against to the tree mangers and to Emilio Palacio, the
reactions of the international community was immediate and they questioned the
judicial resolution.
One of the organizations that was the Committee for
the protection of the journalist because they were disappointed because of the
tribunal decision sentence that was still going with the sentence of El
Universo newspaper, and also according to the CPJ it is not only to threat
against a Journal of the country but the threat, the control and the
prohibition to any type of freedom of expression, so that, I think that the
judgment that was approved only searched to silence to the critical press.
Another pronunciation was done by the Inter American Press
Association (IAPA), they were sure that the ratification of the judgment only
wanted to impose the censorship in the independent journalism and a good
example for explain it, it is the imposition of a sorrow of sail and the
indemnification millionaire. Nevertheless for the Inter American Company it was
a hope in the National Court of Justice which must watch for the interests and
the beginning of the freedom of press and expression, which must occupy first
place in a democracy, but especially this expression liberty must be respect
and guarantee by the State.
As we know the judgment that was done by the judge
Juan Paredes consisted in condemned to three years of jail and a payment of 40$
million to the director of the diary, Carlos Perez, the assistant directors
Cesar Perez and Nicolas Perez, and Emilio Palacio, author of column of considered insulting opinion
against to the President Rafael Correa.
We conclude that actually our justice is subordinated
to the political power and to a judicial manipulation on the part of the
executive power because if we are not agree with his government or if we says
or write something against him, we could get in trouble as Emilio Palacio, so
in Ecuador for to talk and to give an opinion we have to be careful.
Bibliography:
Cronología
del caso El Universo, check
in:http://www.elcomercio.com/politica/Cronologia-caso-Universo_0_653934662.html.



La libertad de expresión en el mundo entero es un derecho primordial a la hora de comentar o de dar una opinión personal, en este caso el periodista Emilio Palacio fue muy mal visto por parte del Presidente Rafael Correa ya que todo estaba en su contra, es cierto que la mayor parte de su escrito fue con insultos e indirectas hacia el presidente, pero el caso fue llevado al extremo. Emilio Palacio tuvo que huir del país al haber una orden de captura y quedo con una mala imagen ante el ámbito internacional, siendo haciendo que se hicieran presentes reclamando el derecho de la libertad de expresión. Me parece que los medios de comunicación tienen que publicar textos basados en hechos reales siempre y cuando sea sin agredir a nadie con insultos o burlas para que en un futuro se pueda evitar este tipo de problemas.
ResponderEliminarAndrés Robayo
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador
Facultad de Ciencias Administrativas y Contables
I really enjoy reading this article, because I see how things are changing in our country, is important to realize that freedom of expression is a right that gives life to different opinion and this start the debate, this is good for democracy, but how this affects our country?, further of the violation of human rights as I student of foreign affairs I really thing that this has several consequence to the Ecuador, we have to ask if something has change of if we are more afraid or not to give a opinion in public. Also how the international organism are involve in this and what measure have been applied for the citizens to fell more free in society.
ResponderEliminarJuan Fernando Larco
I really think that in a politically liberal society no issue can be more important than what amount of attention should be devoted, to our duties as members of a society or our own individual rights and liberties. Each individual, their surrounding society and the government responsible for overseeing them must ask this question.
ResponderEliminar